[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FreeQt ?

> As for OSS -- I had the impression that if I submitted patches to make
> the modules *accept* command line arguments, they wouldn't be
> included.  But yeah, if they're straight GPL'ed that's good enough; I
> could still distribute such patches even if they weren't included.
> (and actually, everything in the *kernel* sources looks fine; I think
> I was probably interpreting stuff that I saw on the usslite website.
> So strictly speaking we're back to *one* bad example, which is QT...)

And then there's Cygnus, and cygwin32.dll - which is under the GPL,
not the LPGL... 

(sorry for the cheap shot)


 - Jim

Attachment: pgpghB8EsAdJq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: