Re: Using CVS for package development
On Thu, 29 May 1997, Paul Bame wrote:
> = > Should this CVS repository be mandatory, i.e. does every Debian
> = > package have to be there?
> A brief word of warning... (I tried CVS on dpkg a while back)
> The natural CVS model is to name the directory for the package,
> for example .../dpkg/ and relegate the version numbers to tags.
> At least one package (dpkg) uses its directory name in such a way
> that when the directory is .../dpkg/ the build fails, while it
> works when the directory is a versioned one, .../dpkg-1.2.3/.
This has been fixed now, since 184.108.40.206 (it was in my original automakizing
patch, it now using the debian changelog to determine version).
Tom Lees <email@example.com> http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/
PGP ID 87D4D065, fingerprint 2A 66 86 9D 02 4D A6 1E B8 A2 17 9D 4F 9B 89 D6
finger firstname.lastname@example.org for full public key (also available on keyservers)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .