Re: Using CVS for package development
Rob Browning writes:
> I guess I was looking for -ko, since you wouldn't want to be rewriting
> the $Id$ values for the upstream source unless you actually changed
> things, and even then it's kind of iffy since your tree has nothing to
> do with theirs. In addition, without -ko, you'd get a bunch of
> spurious diffs against the upstream source.
I don't how how to do that, but some people use their own keyword
instead of $Id$. You'll find $XConsortium$ all around X11 code, I
think; I already saw another such keyword, but can't remember where.
I found nothing in the doc when I looked for it last year. On last
resort, a specially-compiled CVS could be used ?
Maybe we could use a $DebianId$ ?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .