[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IMPORTANT: Unstable fixes not in frozen



> debmake               3.2.4           3.3.0

the current debmake depends on libc6, which isn't in unstable, as far
as I can tell; is that correct, or should I check for mirroring problems?

How important is it to get *unimportant* changes into frozen? for example:
> mtools                3.5a-1          3.6-1
   keeps the version number clean, but no linux changes
> oldmitpthreads        0.0             0.1
   mostly cosmetic, only Ada users are going to *maybe* use this anyway

ie. these are harmless to put in frozen, but also not worth going out
of your way to unless doing so doesn't cost anything...

I'm going to upload new X packages tonight or tomorrow morning; all
they do is change the maintainer name and patch xrdb -- so should they
go into frozen too?


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: