[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can we upload binaries using libc6 to hamm yet?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Thomas Koenig wrote:
> David Engel wrote:
> >On Apr 21, Tom Lees wrote
> >> Seeing as hamm is supposed to be libc6, and I some new stuff to upload
> >> into hamm, can I compile it against libc6?
> 
> >I would think so.  FWIW, I'm building the new glibc 2.0.3 right now to
> >go into unstable.
> 
> What about maintainers who don't have libc6 yet (like me)?  Should I
> stop providing i386 binaries to hamm, and wait for somebody else to
> compile them for libc6?  If I provide libc5 binaries, what about
> differeniating the *.deb file names for libc5 and libc6?

I don't see the point in doing that. If we have already decided hamm to be
libc6-based, all packages, sooner or later, must be re-compiled to use
libc6.

Brian, after libc6 being installed in unstable, will you report a zillion
bugs against all packages requiring a recompile? [ This would also serve
as a developer-ping ].

I guess this is going to be fun :-)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBM1zyACqK7IlOjMLFAQEkSgP5ASYXOkNZNXfI3PpYeZZPU8HjELLzPNzw
r5OlOhB1lBH523uwhtEa6guU20Hzj7uJkbXCtGvbZMwH+emsIfOIud2shwUpCLtF
eij1AjeGJeQJ6cDbdHi1wzhH+rdk4O8XSWhN8xKTNE6jMYDYo5CMdc6zgW9AqCtO
5/icgvFYZW8=
=t1rk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . Trouble? 
e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: