[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Criteria for experimental uploads

On 21 Apr 1997, Guy Maor wrote:

> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:
> > 	I think we need experimental for packages that are just that
> >  -- thing which don't necesarily work, and only people who take their
> >  their system's well being in their own hands use that package
> Fine.  Put those packages into experimental PROVIDED that a version
> already exists in unstable.  Otherwise the new, alpha, buggy,
> install-this-and-your-system-will-surely-explode-providing-mortal-
> injury-to-many-woman-and-children goes into unstable.

 I don't think so. Experimental has been a way to distribute things among
developers without having to include them in the distribution.
 Either experimental should go back to what it was, or a new section
should be created. I suggest the former.

Nicolás Lichtmaier.-

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: