Re: Criteria for experimental uploads
On 21 Apr 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I think we need experimental for packages that are just that
> > -- thing which don't necesarily work, and only people who take their
> > their system's well being in their own hands use that package
> Fine. Put those packages into experimental PROVIDED that a version
> already exists in unstable. Otherwise the new, alpha, buggy,
> injury-to-many-woman-and-children goes into unstable.
I don't think so. Experimental has been a way to distribute things among
developers without having to include them in the distribution.
Either experimental should go back to what it was, or a new section
should be created. I suggest the former.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .