Re: Criteria for experimental uploads
Andy Mortimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The reasoning behind dpkg-mountable going into experimental was
> that, if it went wrong, it could do some very obscure things to
> peoples' systems
Never the less, it should go into unstable and have a prominent
warning in the description. I hardly think users are installing new
> Either create an `alpha' distribution, or similar, containing things
> which people want to have tested before they `go public',
We have one of these. It's called `unstable'.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .