On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Richard Kaszeta wrote:
> I do have a question about the new teTeX packages:
> I don't the the copyright information include is correct (the
> tetex-base I just downloaded from 'bo' had the GPL in there). While
> this is true for most of the stuff, I am certain it is not the case
> for the entire package (although if this is not the case it is the
> fault of the upstream maintainer, Thomas Esser)
You are right. IMHO not everything is "free" and some parts have to be
placed in non-free.
Perhaps we should make a package "tetex-nonfree" that contains these files
and which is placed in non-free? I would like to see all the tetex*
packages it non-free!
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
! ___; email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
- Re: teTeX
- From: Chow Chi-Ming <email@example.com>
- From: Richard Kaszeta <firstname.lastname@example.org>