[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: teTeX

On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Richard Kaszeta wrote:

> I do have a question about the new teTeX packages:
> I don't the the copyright information include is correct (the
> tetex-base I just downloaded from 'bo' had the GPL in there).  While
> this is true for most of the stuff, I am certain it is not the case
> for the entire package (although if this is not the case it is the
> fault of the upstream maintainer, Thomas Esser)

You are right. IMHO not everything is "free" and some parts have to be
placed in non-free.

Perhaps we should make a package "tetex-nonfree" that contains these files
and which is placed in non-free? I would like to see all the tetex*
packages it non-free!



--          _,,     Christian Schwarz
           / o \__   schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@debian.org,
           !   ___;   schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de, bm955877@muenchen.org
           \  /        
  \\\______/  !        PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7  34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
   \          /         http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/

Reply to: