Re: Emacs and XEmacs coexisting
>>>>> "GM" == Guy Maor <email@example.com> writes:
GM> Mark Eichin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> If I patched emacs19 to make the
>> test broader, or at least handle xemacs specifically in the failure
>> branch, would that suffice?
GM> If it works, it would be ideal.
One solution is to compile packages only with XEmacs because Emacs is
backward compatible. I don't know what is the impact. From my
experience problems arise from incompatible functions like key
definitions rather than byte compilation.
Just my 2 cents.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com