Re: Do we want to have sc?
Martin> Good evening folks, the question tonight is: Do we want to have sc
Martin> for Debian GNU/Linux or not?
A sc user asked me that (as I'm the slsc maintainer) ... why not?
Martin> I have packaged it, because I needed it on some of my machines. I
Martin> know that there is slsc which is based on the same version of sc
Martin> that I have packaged.
Could you consider packaging sc-6.21? slsc is derived from sc-6.1 so I think
it's less useful to package sc-6.1. If I'm not mistaken, you can configure
the slsc keystrokes if you find them too emacsish (I like that ...)
Martin> But slsc is a) based on slang and b) uses incompatible keystrokes.
Martin> It is ok for me if you say that slsc is enough sc, but if not I'd
Martin> like to upload the package, otherwise it stays local. :)
I don't really care. Sc-6.21, from what I hear, a more powerful than sc-6.1
and hence slsc. Personally speaking, I get what I need at home out of slsc.
And there is Lotus on the Sparcs at work ...
Dirk Eddelb"uttel http://rosebud.sps.queensu.ca/~edd
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com