Re: Future Debian CD plans
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Shimon@i-Connect.Net, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Future Debian CD plans
- From: Winfried Truemper <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 23:22:56 +0100 (MET)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970118230747.7397Efirstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: Winfried Truemper <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.94.970118213542.25046Cfirstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Martin Konold wrote:
> But still I am strongly against a split into official and non-official
> Debian CDs.
At least it's distinguished between both. But even that could be seen as
violation of the fundamental policy: from various READMEs it's clear that
all the software in Debian should be free. Defining what is "official"
through something in "non-free" (or something which has the same status)
is very problematic.
I strongly encourage everyone to check if this practice would be still in
sync with the intentions of the project.
I mean, we have alternatives to place Debian in the commercial area and/or
to collect money (ask in Debian-users and you will get millionaire).
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.