Re: virtual maintainers, old source format, and a suggestion
"Larry 'Daffy' Daffner" <email@example.com> writes:
> OK, I've got a question here...
> Do we have any idea how many packages are currently assigned to
> "virtual maintainers"? Is it reasonable to guess that this list and
> the list of packages in the old source format are somewhat similar? My
> guess would be yes.
> Someone mentioned the possibility of a developer ping. I think that
> this might be a good idea. Send out 1 mail message per package to the
> maintainer of the package, or maybe just restrict it to packages that
> haven't had a new version uploaded in in the past X months. The
> packages which 'fail' this ping, either through bad addresses or no
> response, then can get posted to the list for reassignment. Any
> packages which no one volunteers for should then be moved into
> contrib, since they would not be considered maintained/supported at
> that point.
> Anyone else think this would be a good idea? What would be a
> reasonable time frame for "No upload since", if it goes that route?
> And what would be a reasonable response time?
Give the developers at least a month to respond, maybe 2 months. For
many packages, no contact for 2 months is fine. How about starting to
ping only those who use outdated formats. The required packages, and
certain other critical packages, should have shorter terms.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com