[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Polisy question.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hi,
I have packed xfaces, a utility whose main propose is to display a list of
faces representing new mails (it might be used for representing other
lists too). Now this can be done either by getting the faces image from a
mail headder (XFace) or by looking up the domain/user in a local datavase
of users/domains and display the most significant face found.

Now for this program to be realy usefull, you need some sort of local
faces databse, and there is a few to chose between depending on what you
want to list. I am planing to pack them in the following groups:

  domains
  users
  news
  weather

Now, I have two problems. First the naming of the packages. Shall them all
start with facesdb or something to indicate that, or is the names used
above acceptable?

Second, the Recommends: and Suggest: fields of xfaces, what should they
include? The xfaces isn't realy usfully without a faces database, but you
sertany don't need all of them.

Thanx for any advice.

- ---------------------------------------------------------------
 Name:        Hakan Ardo
 E-Mail:      hakan@debian.org
 WWW:         http://www.ub2.lu.se/~hakan/sig.html
 Public Key:  Try "finger hakan@master.debian.org"
 Fingerprint: E9 81 FD 90 53 5C E9 3E  3D ED 57 15 1B 7E 29 F3
 Interests:   WWW, Programming, 3D graphics

 Thought for the day: As long as one understands, the
 spelling does not matter :-)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMtkoTd6dx9igIm71AQHzYgQA4aFiQdrz1RywH5/T3ck8tWltkGk/Wbw9
qy0cx5LjcO67S3v38MxOBJfRmwriwPooGlH4yIr3wc92651Y/WNBB3+zVdI/L8un
FwRtbX/OYttr1dcVNFfhbjhsX5ZIPMzzKXY6sDWBV+gkgrhFfW9HdSlf5B2TH43g
n1wcxFdvtrM=
=T6Lm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com


Reply to: