Re: libgdbm 1.7.3 reworked with debmake
I'd appreciate if you would maintain the packages. I think I am done with
them now. If there are any more issues coming up with debmake then please
tell me. I changed the maintainer since I thought the packages were
abandoned. Just upload a new version with a maintainer change.
If you dont have the time: I can scan through the bug list and see what
else to do.
Do you know who is doing libz? I am going to do that next I guess.
On 14 Dec 1996, Mark Eichin wrote:
eichin >yeah, libgdbm (and libdb) predate the current standards, and I never
eichin >made the time to convert them. Thanks! (especially if this improves
eichin >debmake in the process...)
eichin >
eichin >(We'll see how many of my other packages I can switch to debmake, or
eichin >at least the new standard, before 12/31...)
eichin >
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
PGP Public Key = FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33 C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: