The list broken or smail broken?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: The list broken or smail broken?
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 05:33:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.961212053201.7089A-100000@waterf.org>
In-reply-to: <199612120833.AAA12477@hur.fuller.edu>

I get these strange messages since I switched to smail on my home system.
Any know what this is all about?

On Thu, 12 Dec 1996 debian-devel-owner-clameter=waterf.org@lists.debian.org wrote:

debian-devel-owner-clameter=waterf.org >--
debian-devel-owner-clameter=waterf.org >TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-owner-clameter=waterf.org >debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
debian-devel-owner-clameter=waterf.org >

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
PGP Public Key  =  FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33  C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The list broken or smail broken?
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Suggestion before release.
Next by Date: Re: Bugreports
Previous by thread: Re: lshell and "security" (was: Re: double <h2> in http://www.debian.org/index.html)
Next by thread: Re: The list broken or smail broken?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread