Re: Documentation formats
Mark Eichin writes ("Re: Documentation formats"):
> if we standardize the names for the alternate formats, can we also
> have, for each format foo, a virtual foo-viewer package, and include
> it in the dependencies? (That will, as a side effect, make it easier
> to determine which formats are supported in a given package...)
It looks like we don't have a consensus or indeed a technical basis
for a decision on documentation formats, so we'll keep the current
ad-hoc arrangements for the moment.
When we go for a more formalised scheme this sounds like a good idea.
Ian.
Reply to: