Re: Using 2.1 kernels.
firstname.lastname@example.org (Shaya Potter) wrote on 14.12.96 in <Pine.SUN.3.91.961214221935.6669A-100000@itd>:
> Now that I got my question answered that I won't kill my debian system by
> running 2.1, Is there any advantage to running 2.1 over 2.0 in the real
> world. I looked through a "make menu-config", and didn't see anything
> new that I could use, except maybe ipv6 (but only for sentimental
> reasons), is 2.1 improved in some profound way over 2.1. I don't mind
> using a kernel that can be "unstable" I lived with the 1.3 series,
> because I needed appletalk support.
It's supposed to be significantly faster (again). I think there are also
some of the usual new stuff in 2.1 that didn't yet make it into 2.0, but I
don't remember which.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com