[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Qmail

On Sun, 15 Dec 1996, Lars Wirzenius wrote:

liw >A qmail-package like netscape-package might be appropriate.
liw >
liw >OTOH, I've been led to understand that the qmail authors don't
liw >really want it to be distributed in any form until it's finished
liw >(version 1.0). While it certainly sounds like a really, really
liw >good program (compared to security-hole-per-week sendmail), perhaps
liw >we should be polite and wait for the final release? Or at least
liw >ask the authors if they oppose a packager package.

Could the qmail expert in our midst advise us?

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
PGP Public Key  =  FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33  C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5 

Attachment: pgp6LRBIjuutG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: