Re: libgdbm 1.7.3 reworked with debmake
On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, David Engel wrote:
david >A very quick check revealed one problem/question. Why did you change
david >the package names from libgdbm1[-dev] to libgdbm[-dev]?
Because I did not know.... Just erased the package from Incoming. In a few
minutes you will have the correct named package which are building right
now and also the missing .orig.tar.gz file.
david >> This is the first library done with debmake so if there is anything I'd
david >> rather fix it now than later.
david >I believe libelf0 was built with debmake.
But debmake was not fitted to the task. I want to simplify things as much
as possible and I found some issues with debmake.
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
PGP Public Key = FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33 C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com