Re: libgdbm 1.7.3 reworked with debmake
Christoph Lameter writes:
> I reworked libgdbm 1.7.3 with debmake (fixed some issues in both packages
> in the process....). libgdbm was especially unnerving since it did
> not provide a .shlibs file making work difficult with other packages.
> Could someone check my work and see if its ok? Can I just go ahead and
> rework the other problem libraries in the same way?
A very quick check revealed one problem/question. Why did you change
the package names from libgdbm1[-dev] to libgdbm[-dev]?
> This is the first library done with debmake so if there is anything I'd
> rather fix it now than later.
I believe libelf0 was built with debmake.
David Engel Optical Data Systems, Inc.
firstname.lastname@example.org 1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400 Richardson, TX 75081
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com