Re: Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?

To: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?
From: Dirk.Eddelbuettel@qed.econ.queensu.ca
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 96 12:27 EST
Message-id: <m0vTtC8-000EztC@bird.sps.queensu.ca>
In-reply-to: <m0vTt4w-0004OlC@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <m0vTt4w-0004OlC@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

  Ian>  If there are no other major changes to -2 then definitely.

Can't we just fix this and make a non-maintainer release of smail?

Has anyone heard from Soenke lately? Maybe he became a virtual maintainer?

--
   PGP key fingerprint = B2 49 75 BF 44 2C B7 AA  50 CB 19 7D 80 F7 CB DC
   http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/~edd edd@qed.econ.queensu.ca edd@debian.org


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?
  - From: "Larry 'Daffy' Daffner" <vizzie@airmail.net>

References:
- Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?
Next by Date: Re: Goodbye, all! (Whatever became of X3.2)
Previous by thread: Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?
Next by thread: Re: Push smail 3.2-2 into frozen?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread