Re: depends for *exact* upstream matches?
> seem's so (see other comments). but why do you expect that future
> upstream versions of gcc break existing code for ada support?
In this case, because gnatgcc won't even be able to *find* the
compiler in a future version, because cc1 will have a different
pathname (gnat uses C for some table generation at link time, it
appears, and it needs to find as there too.) The change from 2.7.2 to
2.7.2.1 broke this, even though nothing other than a few optimization
bits were changed...
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: