Re: depends for *exact* upstream matches?
Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com> writes:
> The GNAT (GNU NYU Ada Translator) package is almost done, I have
> explored some interesting corners of package building in working with
> the new tools. (all in all, they're very nice, now that I've mostly
> figured out which things they do and which they don't :-) The real
> question, though: is
> Depends: gcc (>= 2.7.2.1), gcc (<< 2.7.2.2)
> a correct way to indicate that I want exactly 2.7.2.1 upstream
> release, but I don't care what debian revision? As far as I can tell
> it *works* but I haven't tested it with a gcc upgrade, for example.
>From dpkg programmers' manual:
The relations allowed are <<, <=, =, >= and >> for strictly earlier,
earlier or equal, exactly equal, later or equal and strictly later,
respectively.
Sven
--
Sven Rudolph <sr1@inf.tu-dresden.de> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: