Re: stability of non-free?
Christian Schwarz wrote:
:
: On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Chris Fearnley wrote:
: > 'Heiko Schlittermann wrote:'
: > > stable ---+---- free (or supported, or ...)
: > > +---- contrib
: > > +---- non-free
vs.
: > that I'll add my "no" to the chorus: NO! Hiding non-free under other
: > directories make it harder for CD vendors to notice it and avoid
: > problems. The suggestion of having stable/unstable under the non-free
: > directory is the only acceptable change. Its main problem is who will
...
:
: OK, but then I would suggest something like
:
: debian -+----- free -----+- stable
: +- unstable
: +- frozen
But, who is expected to need a faster, cleaner overview? A CDROM vendor
(how many are there) or a potential FTP archive user? And if somebody
likes to burn it's _own_ CD (for _personal_ use, read: instead of
messing with myriads of diskettes), I'd assume that he/she would include non-free
anyway.
For a CDROM vendor it should be sufficient, if it's made very clear, that
there're copyright restrictions on non-free and probabley on contrib.
Heiko
--
email : heiko@lotte.sax.de heiko@debian.org heiko@sax.de
pgp : A1 7D F6 7B 69 73 48 35 E1 DE 21 A7 A8 9A 77 92
finger: heiko@sax.sax.de heiko@master.debian.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: