Re: tcsh package
>On Sat, 5 Oct 1996, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Not under under circumstances. /usr/local is sacred. If tcsh is
>> important enough to have a link in /usr/local/bin, so are bash,
>> emacs, gcc, and fileutils.
>Well, it's sure sacred, but I think it won't hurt much to put there
>one symbolic link, because if you have a network with linux boxen
>and other unices, say, Suns, FreeBSD boxen and SGIs, the sysadmin
>will probably set users' shells as /usr/local/bin/tcsh. Or is it
>better to document it and the sysadmin will set the link himself?
Just document it and have the sysadmin set the link if s/he wants it.
1. /usr/local shouldn't be touched. It's 'local', and the package
maintainer doesn't know what's there. What if I already (for any
number of reasons) had a tcsh there?
2. Right now, /usr/local is a network mounted directory, and for added
safety it is mounted ro. I already have a bit of a pain upgrading
emacs since it wants to diddle around making directories that already
Richard W Kaszeta Graduate Student/Sysadmin
firstname.lastname@example.org University of MN, ME Dept
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com