Re: New virtual package names.
On 27 Aug 1996, Rob Browning wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> writes:
>
> > (Until they try to remove all editors)
>
> I don't want to cause trouble, but why don't we just completely
> disallow the removal of ae. It's harmless, and the entire package
> only takes up 54K. I can't see that it's worth spending another
> second even thinking about.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
Well, this brings us full circle.
Rob, the declaration of ae as essential has been declared a bug. This kept
ae from being removed which caused some to complain. The current
discussion is an attempt to move beyond this.
Ian's position is that it doesn't matter if ae and all other editors are
removed from the system. Yours is that it doesn't matter if ae can't be
removed. I hope that we can come to some middle ground here.
Thanks,
Dwarf
------------ --------------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net
------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------
Reply to: