>> libc.so.5 libc5 (>= 5.2.18-2) Hmm. How are we going to determine the minor versions? I run an "unstable" system and use it for my development -- but my packages are mostly user applications that really don't care about the particular rev of libc, just about the soname... so emacs, for example, needs 5.2.18, but really doesn't care if it's -2 or -9...