Inconsistant package names.
While working on the base upgrade, I have found 3 cases where the package
name on the .deb file and the package name used by dpkg -s are not the
same:
ld.so => ldso
sh-utils => shellutils
sysklogd => syslogd
I understand the reason for all but the last one. Is there some reason
(other than Murphy) that the package name sysklogd can not appear in the
control file Package: field?
Later,
Dwarf
------------ --------------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net
------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------
Reply to: