Re: Status of libgr vs. other graphics libs (gimp dependencies).

To: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Status of libgr vs. other graphics libs (gimp dependencies).
From: Rob Browning <osiris@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 22:23:58 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 199604300323.WAA02032@raven.ots.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Apr 1996 22:07:24 CDT." <Pine.SOL.3.91.960429220156.23760D-100000@brando.ece.utexas.edu>

>>>>> "G" == Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu> writes:

G> After I upload those 2 packages, libgr should go away.  Feel free
G> to package GIMP though.

Oh, I already have, and it's been released, I was just trying to
decide what to do for the next revision.

Thanks
--
Rob

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Symbol conflict in GDB under Emacs
Next by Date: Re: Status of libgr vs. other graphics libs (gimp dependencies).
Previous by thread: Status of libgr vs. other graphics libs (gimp dependencies).
Next by thread: Re: Status of libgr vs. other graphics libs (gimp dependencies).
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread