Re: zlib1 doesn't need to conflict with libgr, does it?

[Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>]

In message <[🔎] 199604251745.NAA24489@syntropy.netaxs.com>, Chris Fearnley writes:
>Package: zlib1
>Version: 0.99-2
>zlib1 conflicts with libgr.  Why not use the replaces mechanism?

I thought I had a good answer to that, but, upon further reflection,
it seems that I don't.  Replaces doesn't apply (there are no name
conflicts tha I know of), but in retrospect the conflict seems to stem
only from my dislike of libgr.

Mike.
--
"Don't let me make you unhappy by failing to be contrary enough...."