Re: junk/pine releases
'Dale Scheetz wrote:'
>
>2. This release of pine has included the imapd supplied with pine source.
>I have had great conceptual problems with this addition. I feel compelled
>to inform the installer that they are getting this program, and ask
>permission to modify configuration files to configure it. I would prefer
>to be able to install it or not, at the installers preference, but dpkg
>doesn't seem to support this (yes/no?). Aside from asking some possibly
>confusing questions I see no answer to this other than splitting the
>imapd out into a separate binary package. Then I can safely assume that
>the installer has chosen to get this new daemon installed and properly
>perform the configuration in inetd. Any ideas on this issue would be
>greatly appreciated.
I think imapd belongs in netstd. Maybe Peter would be willing to take
it?
--
Christopher J. Fearnley | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
cjf@netaxs.com | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | Design Science Revolutionary
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Explorer in Universe
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Linux Advocate
Reply to: