Re: New xpm package...
Ian Jackson writes:
> IMO it's fine for a package's source filename to be different from its
> binary filename, in cases like the one above (xpm). Make sure,
> though, that the .deb file has an appropriate `Source' field in its
> control file.
See my later message on the subject:
I was thinking of (easily) dealing with source for multiple soname'd shared
libs in the archive.
Carl Streeter | "Etiquette-wise, there is no proper time
email@example.com | to use the phrase 'It sucks.'" --Dogbert
Just another Perl hacker | "I'm a heartless bastard." --Linus Torvalds
Ask me about Debian/GNU Linux. | http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~streeter/