[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

netscape-2.0-3 released



As long as the archive distributed by netscape will run on an a.out
system (and I suspect it should), this could be added to both stable
and development trees.  I have no way to test it, however.


Date: 25 Feb 96 04:56 UT
Source: netscape
Binary: netscape 
Version: 2.0-3
Maintainer: Brian White <bcwhite@pobox.com>
Description: 
 netscape: Popular Wold-Wide-Web browser software
 :  Netscape (pronounced "Mozilla") is a graphical World-Wide-Web browser
 :  with many features.  It supports advanced features of HTML and new
 :  technologies such as "Java" from Sun Microsystems.
 :  .
 :  Netscape Communications Corporation does not allow redistribution of
 :  their software.  Therefore, this package requires the user to fetch
 :  the netscape archive seperately and place it in the directory pointed
 :  to by the TMPDIR environment variable (or /tmp if TMPDIR not defined)
 :  before attempting to install this package.  You can get the
 :  linux-i486 packages via anonymous ftp from "ftp[1-9].netscape.com".
 :  .
 :  Netscape Communications Corporation does not support the Linux release
 :  in the slightest, even for paying customers.  It has been made available
 :  purely as a courtesy, so please do not send them questions about Linux.
 :  .
 :  This installer package has been placed in the public domain!
Priority: Low
Changes: 
 - Changed maintainer name to remove full-stop
 - Fixed location of copyright file (was: /usr/copyright)
Files:
 -rw-r--r--   1 root     root         3743 Feb 24 23:55 netscape-2.0-3.tar.gz
 -rw-r--r--   1 root     root         3362 Feb 24 23:55 netscape-2.0-3.deb
 9073edf8b5fc3254eb81012491183d0d  netscape-2.0-3.tar.gz
 2393fc0ccff32c98645241a2ff3fa91e  netscape-2.0-3.deb

                                        Brian
                                 ( bcwhite@bnr.ca )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In theory, theory and practice are the same.  In practice, they're not.


Reply to: