Re: Updating gcc under 1.1
People, to avoid confusion like that below can we please not use the
new <= >= syntax in package control files just yet ?
Chris Jones writes ("Re: Updating gcc under 1.1"):
> Mark Constable wrote:
> > I know I'm using v1.1, please, I don't want a spanking, just some
> > assistance. I hit this little brick wall.
> > -> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gcc:
> > -> gcc depends on binutils (>=2.5.2l.20); however:
> > -> Version of binutils on system is 2.6-2dpkg: error processing gcc ->
> > Isn't 2.6-2 > 188.8.131.52 ?
> > I got both from ftp.debian.org a few hours ago.
> > Also, my mirror seems to be a mess and lots of timeouts in the reports.
> > Should I blow it away and start again ? Is ftp.debian.org ready yet ?
> > --
> > Mark Constable (+61 7 55275724)
> > mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
> > http://www.ion.com.au/linus/markc
> I got the some problem so I removed the binutils and then installed
> them again. Didn't help, figured it was a problem with the dependency
> checking. So, I went ahead and did a dpkg -i --force-depends. Every
> thing seems to be working fine.