Re: nvi 1.34-7 now available

[richard@sfere.elmail.co.uk (Richard Kettlewell)]

Ian Murdock writes:

>BTW, a suggestion wrt priority numbers--we should consider making the
>lower numbers the highest priorities (i.e., the highest priority would
>be 0; 10 would be a higher priority than 20; etc.).  By doing this, we
>could centrally specify one specific package as the "default".  In the
>case of vi, the centrally-specified default is nvi, which could have
>priority 0.

If negative priorities are supported then this effect can be achieved
using those, of course, though it might look rather odd ;-)

-- 
Richard Kettlewell                 <URL:http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/>
Work+home: <richard@elmail.co.uk>       Home only: <richard@sfere.elmail.co.uk>