Bug#1756: SEGV in "at" date parsing
Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:
>The at command sometimes has problems with date parsing which result
>in a SEGV. For example:
>$ at tomorrow
I think I've fixed this in the most recent version of at, 2.9a,
which has been out since August or so.
Thomas Kvnig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, firstname.lastname@example.org.
The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double