[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: twm

On Feb 17, 1994 Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> I think twm should be included -- it is the standard wm for X,
> after all i.e. the only one which the X developers themselves write
> and update. (isn't it?).  I myself have only ever used twm,
> ol{v,}wm and mwm  -- never touched fvwm.

Yes, I agree, twm should be included.  Personally, I'd like to see
tvtwm in there as well (that's what I use) but that may be a bit much.
(If you're not familiar with it, tvtwm is twm with a virtual desktop
and the provision than it pipes the .tvtwmrc file through m4 before it
loads it)

 /~> Ian McCloghrie      |       FLUG:  FurryMUCK Linux User's Group
< <  /~\ |~\ |~> |  | <~ | email: ian@ucsd.edu               Net/2, USL 0!
 \_> \_/ |_/ |~\ |__| _> | Card Carrying Member, UCSD Secret Islandia Club
GCS (!)d-(--) p c++ l++(+++) u+ e-(soon) m+ s+/+ n+(-) h- f+ !g w+ t+ r y*

Reply to: