Re: Mass bug filing / call for testing: dependencies on SDL 1.2

[Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com>]

There should be a lot of low hanging fruits,
no need to wait.

By looking in alphabet order I see "ares"
only need to package the new release.

Maybe it would be easier to locate these low-hanging fruits
by cross checking the dd-list with sources with either
- outdated version versus uscan
- broken uscan lookup (the big GitHub change...)

Greetings

@Andreas Wirooks : nice work

Le mer. 21 juin 2023 à 11:33, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> a écrit :
> What I would prefer to try to avoid here is for maintainers to think
> "I'll just wait for SDL 3", and then time passes, maintainers are busy
> with something else, we freeze, and we have to ship trixie with *three*
> major versions of SDL (or at least their -compat equivalents).
>
>     smcv
>