Re: Bug#740565: redeclipse-data: should be in main
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Martin Erik Werner
> On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 15:30 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> On 27.07.2014 10:23, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
>> > As far as I see it, it is still uncertain whether redeclipse-data
>> > belonging in main is a correct assumption, a re-review of the content
>> > would be needed, from the previous discussion I think it is indeed
>> > *probable* that it would be found fit for main.
>> I have reviewed redeclipse and redeclipse-data file-by-file. The patches
>> are now attached to this bug report. The licenses are DFSG-free and
>> there is not a single file that wouldn't abide by the rules. The only
>> thing I noticed was a missing license paragraph about a few public
>> domain images which I have added to debian/copyright. The paragraph
>> about the Play* fonts could be removed because it appears you moved the
>> font to a separate package, fonts-play. Otherwise the copyright file was
> Thank you for the review, it is very much appreciated! Both font and P-D
> corrections looks correct (I previously think I let the P-D stuff fall
> through to the Files: * CC-BY-SA glob since they had been modified in
> Red Eclipse), but I think this makes more sense on second thought.
> I have pushed your changes to the git repos for redeclipse.
> Anyone up for sponsoring redeclipse and redeclipse-data for this change?
Sure, put it on the team sponsor queue  and I'll take a look at it
eventually (before the freeze, at worst) if nobody else does.