Hi Mirian, > Wow! So soon? :) Sure ;). > Redarging debian/changelog, as I had already uploaded 1.3.1-1 to the > archive, we should need to ad a newer entry (1.3.1-2) and put the changes > there. This can easily be done with the command dch, or adding it by hand > if you prefer. Oops, my fault. I happened to run apt-get source pink-pony and found it to download 1.2, so I figured you hadn't uploaded the version yet. Apparently, I was falsely relying on my mirror to be up-to-date ;(. > pink-pony now depends on pink-pony-data, and that is okay, it is how it > should be. Another good idea would be to recommend pink-pony > from pink-pony-data (not depend, we don't want cyclical dependencies). > Also, as the versions of pink-pony <= 1.3.1-1 (old ones) will include the > data, pink-pony-data should conflict with them in debian/control too. Fixed! > Last thing should be to add the switch -a to the commands in binary-arch: > and duplicate them with the switch -i in binary-indep:. When the package is > built in the builders, it won't be calling debian/rules binary, but > debian/rules binary-arch for every arch-dependent architecture and once to > debian/rules binary-indep for the arch-independent ones. I wasn't too sure about that. I tried to incorporate your suggestions and doing so, removed some of the commands in binary-arch while copying to binary-indep. I omitted those that explicitly deal with binaries and those that we do not use in the -data package. If this is not correct, please let me know. -nik -- <burny> Ein Jabber-Account, sie alle zu finden; ins Dunkel zu treiben und ewig zu binden; im NaturalNet, wo die Schatten droh'n ;)! PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature