Yeah that is fine with me.
[Added maintainer of premake 3.x to cc:]
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Cameron Hart <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
> I just wanted to follow up on a couple of things - I wasn't sure if premake4
> had made it into unstable yet? Also, when I originally proposed making
$ rmadison premake4
premake4 | 4.3+repack1-1 | experimental | source, amd64, armhf, i386,
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
In other words, no. Packages do not migrate automatically from
experimental to unstable.
> premake4 a new package instead of updating the existing premake package, it
> was suggested that the original premake package could be removed from
> unstable, as it's out of date and doesn't appear to be used by anyone (see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/12/msg00283.html). Does that
> sound like a sensible idea to you and if so are you able to remove it?
James, would you agree to having premake removed from Debian? premake4
is now in the archive, and there are no packages that (build-)depend
Cameron, if you don't hear back from premake's maintainer, file a bug
against the ftp.debian.org pseudo-package. An explanation of the
process can be found here .