Re: Steam for Linux? No thanks.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Dmitry Smirnov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:17:37 Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> Observant readers will note that DRM was _not_ a reason included for
>> the package's rejection.
> Of course, as it been told many times, DRM is not prohibited.
> DRM is an issues with maintainer's conscience, not Policy.
And now you're trying to guilt trip everyone who doesn't agree with
you. A very effective tactic. /sarcasm