[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: quality assurance for games



Hello,

thanks for all the feedback. I have created a wiki page dedicated to the
topic "removal of games" in case someone else is brave enough to mention
this topic again, we can point the delinquent to some resources now.

http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Removal

I hope i have outlined all ideas and thoughts so far which are in favour
of or against the removal of games and all the nuances in between. If i
have missed something, please yell at me.

Otherwise i am in line with Bart's, Jon's, Tobias' and Bas' opinion and
i also think like Emmet that unique games should be preserved. However i
can't see that the games which shall be removed fit in with the term
'unique'. They are merely mini games.

My favorite example why removals make sense is LGeneral. The effort to
bring the game back into shape was the same as to package a completely
new game. Over many years nobody took care of the game. Debian has a
strict policy when it comes to the freeness and quality of software. But
then i ask myself why we are less strict when it comes to longtime
orphaned packages which contain non-free content and besides are
unusable? The old version 1.1.1 is still in unstable and would have been
released with wheezy. Try it out and report back if you can play the game.

It should strike us a little if users do not even bother to report the
problem anymore.

Regards,

Markus


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: