Hello, Given that I have not received any response to my previous request, and questions, I'm re-sending this. On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:35 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 09:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > > > > > Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is > > > partly a RFS, partly a re-review request. > > ... > > > [1] > > > Is this motivation good enough for not using stand-alone Enet? > > > > Hmm, I don't have a good answer for that. > [a] > I'm hesitant, but I think I'll go with embedded Enet for now, given the > indications from upstream. > > (...) > > > [4] > > > List of duplicates have been forwarded, but it's mostly a wontfix since > > > linking isn't as easy on windows. > > > > What about removing the dupes and only referring to the remaining files? > > The given explanation was[0]: > > Some files are made available for modding purposes, the rest are > > impossible to symlink on all platforms. Distribution packagers are > > free to symlink files in individual packages, but this cannot be done > > on a project-wide scale. > [b] > The modding aspect is a reasonable argument for keeping the alternate > files separate (they could be different, but aren't currently), I could > symlink it all for Debian, and the gain would be about 1.3M, do you > think I should? > > I have updated the packaging a bit since the re-review/RFS request, a > few typos, syntax, and style fixes. For each of the git repositories[1] > $ git log --since=debian/1.2_RFS > $ git diff debian/1.2_RFS > should list the changes, I have tagged the state of the repos as of this > email with "debian/1.2_RFS2". > > Do you think these packages might be almost good to go? Would you be > willing to sponsor them at that point? > [c] > [0] http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/redeclipse/ticket/89 > [1] (Once Alioth is up:) > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/cube2font.git > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/redeclipse.git > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/redeclipse-data.git > Also re-uploaded to mentors: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/cube2font > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cube2font/cube2font_1.2-1.dsc > http://mentors.debian.net/package/redeclipse > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/r/redeclipse/redeclipse_1.2-1.dsc > http://mentors.debian.net/package/redeclipse-data > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/r/redeclipse-data/redeclipse-data_1.2-1.dsc > I'd be grateful if someone could have a look at my questions, and if you think the state of the packaging is good, please upload it. Index: [a] Embedded Enet [b] Symlink dupes in Debian packaging? [c] Packaging links Thanks :) -- Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part