Hello all,
I am working on the packaging of the new release nettoe-1.2.1,
of which I am also the upstream coauthor, in addition to being
a junior member of the Debian Games Team.
Now, in #544916 I filed an ITA in response to an RFA issued by
the Debian Games Team.
At this very moment I have so far only assigned a correct value
for 'svn-bp:origUrl' to
'.../trunk/nettoe/debian'
and I have also uploaded
nettoe_1.2.1.orig.tag.gz
to pkg-games.aliot.debian.org.
It is here my questions begin to torment me:
1) Should I keep the Debian Games Team as package maintainer,
and thus add myself as Uploader, or should I impose myself
as new package maintainer in debian/control? The latter
option would better fullful #544916 in my understanding.
2) Following an earlier advice about small svn-commits, I could
at the moment imagine my commits to trunk/nettoe/debian sub-
devided like this:
a) Jump Standards and Compatibility in 'control', 'compat' ,
and a DEP-5 formulated 'copyright'.
b) Make 'rules' use dh instead of many 'dh_*'.
c) Finalise 'control' concerning Maintainer and/or Uploader.
d) Register all changes in 'changelog'.
This would correspond to "small and logical" changes. Of course,
further testing and sponsor-critisism would follow suit. Or, could
there be a reason to make all four changes in one commit, and then
do the corrections afterwards?
Best regards,
--
Mats Erik Andersson, fil. dr
<mats.andersson@gisladisker.se>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature