Re: git vs. svn (again)
Thank for your detailed response. I will reply in detail later, but I
just want to quickly respond to one point:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> The core of my longish mail is: Please do define what you mean by saying
> "git" first before you try to discuss switching to it, it would be much
> more fruitful.
I agree that we need to define our terms much more clearly (and I'll come back
to that) but I must re-iterate, I am not trying to discuss any kind of switch,
I want to just make clear in our documentation which of the two should be
considered the "default" for new packages.
Reply to: