Re: git vs. svn (again)
2009/9/11 Bruno Kleinert <fuddl@tauware.de>:
> Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 15:57 +0100 schrieb Jon Dowland:
>> Last year Barry posted a question about whether we were
>> going to stick with svn or move to git:
>> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2008/11/msg00010.html>
>>
>> What I would like to ask is, which of the two should we
>> *encourage* the use of. I would suggest git for new
>> packages. It would be good to standardise on *encouraging*
>> one (not demanding nor migrating to it) for the purposes of
>> our wiki documentation.
> I'm with you, except, that I would *really strongly* encourage git and
> have Subversion as very, very optional option ;)
>
> I think Subversion could be used by those who joined the team but are
> not familiar with a version control system, because I consider
> Subversion easier to learn and understand. But once familiar how things
> work, we should ask to switch over to git. That's simply my opinion.
After trying both, I personally feel myself more comfortable in SVN,
especially due to the possibility of downloading all the projects at
once. There is not any remote chance that we could have something
similar to that in a git scheme, is it?
Greetings,
Miry
Reply to: