Re: tuxcap and atomic worm (Re: source code of "atomic worm)
2009/6/12 W.P. van Paassen <wp.van.paassen@gmail.com>:
>> I'm currently applying 3 patches to the source [1], in case you might
>> want to have a look at them.
>
> I've applied the particles_res.patch and the abs_dirs.patch, thanks!
Cool, thanks :)
> The no_fsck_32bits_colors.patch is a workaround and might even
> introduce a performance penalty for 24/32 bpp users, so I've just
> checked in a generic version that you might want to use/try.
> see http://tuxcap.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tuxcap/TuxCap/tuxcap/lib/SexyAppBase.cpp?revision=1.28&view=markup
>
> I don't understand the changes in cmakelists.patch. The default
> optimization level for gcc is -O0, besides that, TuxCap's physics code
> depends heavily on inlining which is only enabled by using -O3.
Both are probably Debian-specific, I guess :)
Greeetings,
Miry
Reply to: