Le samedi 10 mai 2008, Ivan Vucica a écrit :
> I think using a 'stable' two year old release should be frowned upon even more, but that's perhaps only my opinion :)
> Think about it this way: as it's a fairly complete lib and obviously inactive (except for latest 1.1.1 it died around 2005, right?) it's highly probable it fixed several bugs while not introducing new ones :)
at least for Lincity-ng physfs 1.0 works fine, and physfs_1.1 caused
some trouble on linux and MacOS.
Maybe it's just lincity-ng which need adjustment ?
Also the project seems not dead, there is some activity on the