On Friday 15 February 2008 9:51:08 pm Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008 3:50 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote: > > My thoughts exactly. > > Hmm, I fail. Actually, my thought was along the lines of Provides fields. > Same concept, different implementation. > > > Richard As far as I know, you still have to provide at least one "real" dependency. -- Regards, Andres